<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida Town&#039;s Sagging Pants Law Unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://birdsongslaw.com/2008/09/19/florida-towns-saggingpants-law-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://birdsongslaw.com/2008/09/19/florida-towns-saggingpants-law-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>A whimisical look at law and politics by Birdsong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikNak</title>
		<link>http://birdsongslaw.com/2008/09/19/florida-towns-saggingpants-law-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>NikNak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdsongslaw.wordpress.com/?p=576#comment-68</guid>
		<description>In total agreement with Catgirl.

It&#039;s funny because I&#039;m going over this notion in my Con law class about why the Supreme Ct should be able to review State Court decisions. No one would believe a State Legislature passed this statute and thought &quot;Yeah, this is constitutional.&quot; I think half the time, statutes are passed and they think &quot;Ehh, who cares about the Constitutionality of the thing, the voters (only people who count to us) will like it. Let just wait until someone brings it to court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In total agreement with Catgirl.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny because I&#8217;m going over this notion in my Con law class about why the Supreme Ct should be able to review State Court decisions. No one would believe a State Legislature passed this statute and thought &#8220;Yeah, this is constitutional.&#8221; I think half the time, statutes are passed and they think &#8220;Ehh, who cares about the Constitutionality of the thing, the voters (only people who count to us) will like it. Let just wait until someone brings it to court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catgirl</title>
		<link>http://birdsongslaw.com/2008/09/19/florida-towns-saggingpants-law-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Catgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdsongslaw.wordpress.com/?p=576#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Prof. Birdsong;
I realize I may be a little late commenting on this post.  I meant to do so earlier, but law school tends to consume much of my time these days.

Kudos to this judge!  I had been reading about these &quot;saggy pants&quot; laws popping up in different jurisdictions and have been appalled.  The thought of taking someone&#039;s freedom away for a clothing &#039;style&#039; or &#039;fad&#039; is reprehensible.

I don&#039;t particularly like the fad of men wearing saggy pants because I think it looks silly.  That&#039;s just my personal preference.  Of course, I don&#039;t feel the need to use the power of Government to force these men to go along with my ideas of style, either.  I think we would be treading on a slippery slope if these laws are allowed to stay on the books.  People didn&#039;t really care for the really short mini skirts, women showing their belly buttons, or women wearing their pants low enough to show some of their thong underwear.  But no one felt it was necessary to make a law banning those styles of clothing.  One day you might be wearing a style or fad of clothing that will be outlawed, but most people don&#039;t think about that until they are the ones in handcuffs being led to jail.

If I was Black, I probably would consider this to be racist as well, simply because other &#039;styles&#039; or &#039;fads&#039; are not being outlawed like this one is.  Most people agree that it is mostly Blacks that like this particular fad of wearing the saggy pants.  Most of the ones I&#039;ve seen, I haven&#039;t even seen any skin, so it can&#039;t be indecent exposure.  I don&#039;t understand what the big deal is about seeing someone&#039;s boxer shorts.  Some of the boxers out now are quite comical, even.

I wish people would quit trying to use the force of Government to accomplish things they don&#039;t have the right to do on their own.
OK, I&#039;m off my soapbox now...

=^. .^=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof. Birdsong;<br />
I realize I may be a little late commenting on this post.  I meant to do so earlier, but law school tends to consume much of my time these days.</p>
<p>Kudos to this judge!  I had been reading about these &#8220;saggy pants&#8221; laws popping up in different jurisdictions and have been appalled.  The thought of taking someone&#8217;s freedom away for a clothing &#8216;style&#8217; or &#8216;fad&#8217; is reprehensible.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t particularly like the fad of men wearing saggy pants because I think it looks silly.  That&#8217;s just my personal preference.  Of course, I don&#8217;t feel the need to use the power of Government to force these men to go along with my ideas of style, either.  I think we would be treading on a slippery slope if these laws are allowed to stay on the books.  People didn&#8217;t really care for the really short mini skirts, women showing their belly buttons, or women wearing their pants low enough to show some of their thong underwear.  But no one felt it was necessary to make a law banning those styles of clothing.  One day you might be wearing a style or fad of clothing that will be outlawed, but most people don&#8217;t think about that until they are the ones in handcuffs being led to jail.</p>
<p>If I was Black, I probably would consider this to be racist as well, simply because other &#8216;styles&#8217; or &#8216;fads&#8217; are not being outlawed like this one is.  Most people agree that it is mostly Blacks that like this particular fad of wearing the saggy pants.  Most of the ones I&#8217;ve seen, I haven&#8217;t even seen any skin, so it can&#8217;t be indecent exposure.  I don&#8217;t understand what the big deal is about seeing someone&#8217;s boxer shorts.  Some of the boxers out now are quite comical, even.</p>
<p>I wish people would quit trying to use the force of Government to accomplish things they don&#8217;t have the right to do on their own.<br />
OK, I&#8217;m off my soapbox now&#8230;</p>
<p>=^. .^=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florida</title>
		<link>http://birdsongslaw.com/2008/09/19/florida-towns-saggingpants-law-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdsongslaw.wordpress.com/?p=576#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] If you liked this post then you may like this one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you liked this post then you may like this one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

